
The 12-inch
ductile iron main was prone to breaks at the bottom of a hilly section of
Martin Luther King Blvd. The mainline served a growing area of the city, now
home to nearly a half- million residents. Residential basements in the
immediate area had flooded several times during main breaks, and the
prospect of digging and replacing the pipe — with resulting disruptions to
traffic — was daunting.
Facing mounting budget pressures, William
Erskine, a mechanical engineer with the Lansing Board of Water and Light,
supported the use of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe and trenchless
installation to fix the line. This would avoid traffic gridlock and save the
city hundreds of thousands of dollars in restoration costs.
Troy Freed of Midwest Trenchless Services in
Grant, Mich., a utility contractor, used pipe bursting to install nearly
1,600 linear feet of 14-inch HDPE pipe. It was the first time in Lansing’s
history that both HDPE pipe and pipe bursting were used.
Challenging conditions
Pipe bursting, which can be pneumatic,
hydraulic expansion or static pull, fractures a pipe and displaces the
fragments outward while a new pipe, of equal or greater diameter, is drawn
in behind.
“This is an area with corrosive, hot soils,”
says Freed. “We needed a pipe that could handle this environment and still
provide a comparable service life. HDPE pipe, with its resistance to
corrosive soils, offered the best option.
“We also were very sensitive to the traffic
conditions in this densely populated part of the city. With an open-cut pipe
installation, the city was concerned about the significant disruption and
anxiety it would cause. The pipe-bursting method gave us a more efficient
installation with less surrounding disruption.” The affected section of the
boulevard had been widened to accommodate the growth.

What Freed and
his contractors found beneath the surface was a damaged 12-inch water main,
and a 6-inch parallel line on the other side of the road that had smaller
service lines connected to it. That meant that the 12-inch line could be
replaced without any water service interruptions. The road is bordered on
each side by single-family housing and a schoolyard, so continued service
was very important.
Making the pull
Freed’s team of installers spent the first day
digging three pits in the middle of the road surface, each 8-by-20 feet. The
north and south pits were 1,600 feet apart, and the middle one was dug at a
35-degree curve in the roadway.
The plan was to perform two separate pulls and
fuse the pipe in the middle, on the curve. “It could have been accomplished
in one pull, but with the curve, it was safer to split the project into two
pulls,” Erskine says.
While the pits were being dug, 40-foot
sections of HDPE pipe was being fused together on the site. Butt fusion was
accomplished by clamping two pipe pieces into a No. 618 fusion machine from
McElroy Manufacturing Inc. of Tulsa, Okla., facing the pipe ends to remove
contamination, and bringing the ends perpendicular to the pipe axis.
The ends are then heated with a resistance
heater according to the pipe manufacturer’s recommendations. When the proper
heat was established, the heater was removed, and a fusion force was applied
between the pipe ends. This force was held until the joints cooled. The
resulting joints were at least as strong as the pipe itself.
On the second day, an HB125 machine from
Earth Tool Co. LLC of Oconomowoc, Wis., was set at the middle pit. The crew
pulled a section of fused piping from the north pit to the middle pit. The
bursting head was outfitted with a cutter/slitter device that split the
ductile iron pipe before the head pushes the pipe apart.
Then the machine was re-positioned to the
south pit, and the process was repeated to the south end of the line. The
final step was to fuse the pipe in the middle and make the connections on
both ends.
Planning for success
Proper planning and design of a pipe-bursting
project is essential to success, Erskine observes. “You have to know the
soil conditions and the condition of the existing pipeline,” he says. “You
also have to know if there is close proximity to other service lines. A
thorough knowledge of what’s already there is a must.”
Freed knew that pipe bursting has limitations.
For example, when used to upsize pipe, it can create ground displacements.
Although the displacements tend to be localized and dissipate rapidly away
from the bursting operation, Freed knew the possibility had to be addressed
on Martin Luther King Blvd.
“The biggest challenge was some heaving in the
road surface as a result of increasing the pipe size,” Erskine said. “That
did happen in a few spots. But we were planning for that, and knew we’d just
have to mill that area. You just need a plan for that onsite and in the
budget.”
Seeing results
Erskine estimates that the pipe-bursting
project was completed in about 60 percent of the time it would have taken
with traditional excavating. The resulting re-paving required just two
inches of asphalt instead of 10 inches of concrete and four inches of
asphalt, because there was almost no ground disruption.
The final price tag was about one-third that
of open cut excavating using another pipe material. “When you’re talking
about a project like this, the dollars saved quickly reach the tens of
thousands,” Erskine says. “It was something to see. I was impressed with how
easily they opened up the hole and how easily the pipe was pulled through.
We haven’t had any trouble or calls since the job has been complete.
“It’s refreshing to find not only economical
alternatives, but also ones that make life easier for our citizens when
aging pipelines have to be replaced. Let’s face it, nobody wants to have
their streets torn up for days and even weeks, much less have to pay for
that level of frustration. I’m sure we’ll be considering this method in the
future.”
Freed, who works almost exclusively with HDPE
pipe, observes, “It was about the city’s being willing to take that first
leap. Pipe bursting was new to the community, but most people who see it
done say they’ll do it this way again.”
Bruce Kuffer, P.E., is manager of polyethylene
market development with the Plastics Pipe Institute, based in East Lansing,
Mich. He can be reached at 469/499-1054 or bkuffer@plasticpipe.org.